To read this content please select one of the options below:

The indirect effects of performance measurement system and organizational ambidexterity on performance

Elizandra Severgnini (Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil)
Valter Afonso Vieira (Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Maringa, Brazil)
Edwin Vladimir Cardoza Galdamez (Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Maringa, Brazil)

Business Process Management Journal

ISSN: 1463-7154

Article publication date: 27 June 2018

Issue publication date: 14 August 2018

1706

Abstract

Purpose

Performance measurement systems (PMSs) have long been used for monitoring and improving administrative performance. In parallel, organizational ambidexterity refers to firms that manage different organizational functions and various demands to generate performance. The purpose of this paper is to propose that three dimensions of PMS increase organizational ambidexterity and consequently they influence organizational performance. In this framework, organizational ambidexterity mediates the relationships between three dimensions of PMS and organizational performance.

Design/methodology/approach

The data were collected through a structured questionnaire sent to Brazilian software companies. Owners, directors, project managers and responsible for company strategy answered the questionnaire. The final sample was 227 Brazilian software firms that answered according to their PMSs and organizational ambidexterity.

Findings

The results provide four main findings. First, the three dimensions of PMS, namely—attention focus, legitimization and strategic decision-making—influenced organizational ambidexterity. Second, organizational ambidexterity had a major effect on organizational performance. Third, organizational ambidexterity mediated the indirect effects of attention focus, legitimization and strategic decision-making on organizational performance. Fourth, exploration and exploitation—two dimensions of organizational ambidexterity—mediated the indirect effect of the abovementioned PMS dimensions on organizational performance.

Research limitations/implications

Although there are different dimensions of organizational ambidexterity, this paper is limited to two of the most used ones: exploitation and exploration. In addition, the results were limited to subjective—in contrast to objective—performance measures.

Practical implications

Software companies can use PMS for attention focus, legitimization of firm’s choices and strategic decision-making to increase their exploration and exploitation capabilities. Moreover, software companies can use strategic decision-making to control existing strategies and establish new strategies for legitimizing ambidextrous choices and thereby support their decision-making process.

Originality/value

The data showed that not only organizational ambidexterity mediates the effects of the three dimensions of PMS use on performance, but also exploration and exploitation.

Keywords

Citation

Severgnini, E., Vieira, V.A. and Cardoza Galdamez, E.V. (2018), "The indirect effects of performance measurement system and organizational ambidexterity on performance", Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 1176-1199. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0159

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles