To read this content please select one of the options below:

Telecare at a crossroads? Finding researchable questions

John Woolham (Department of Health and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London - Strand Campus, London, UK)
Paul Freddolino (Department of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA)
Grant Gibson (Faculty of Social Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK)
Sarah Daniels (UK Demential Research Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK)

Journal of Enabling Technologies

ISSN: 2398-6263

Article publication date: 25 May 2021

Issue publication date: 8 September 2021

127

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to report on a structured attempt to develop new directions for research into telecare. Current research evidence suggests that telecare in the UK is not optimally cost-effective and does not deliver better outcomes than more traditional forms of care and support. To address this problem, an analysis of expert opinion about future directions for research is provided.

Design/methodology/approach

Two electronic surveys of UK based academic experts were conducted. Participants were drawn from a range of professional disciplines, including medicine, social care, occupational therapy and social policy and identified were by their contribution in this, or allied fields. The first survey included nine questions intended to identify at least one new research question that could form the basis of a funding proposal to the Nuffield Foundation, which provided “seedcorn” funding to support this work. Ten themes were identified following thematic analysis. The second survey asked participants to prioritise three of these themes.

Findings

Key themes emerging as priority areas for future research were as follows: the role of assessment in ensuring technology deployment meets the needs of service users; ethical implications of technology and how these might be addressed in the future; and the use of end user co-production/co-creation approaches in the development of new assistive technologies and digital enabled care.

Research limitations/implications

The findings are based on academic expert opinion; perspectives of practitioners, service users and family members are unrepresented.

Practical implications

The findings of this study could contribute to development of new directions for telecare research, and future strategic funding decisions in this rapidly changing field.

Originality/value

Evidence for sub-optimal outcomes for telecare requires new thinking. The authors are not aware of any other study that offers an analysis of expert opinion of fruitful areas for new research into telecare.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge financial support they received from the Nuffield Foundation and authors are also grateful for the insights provided by those who responded to our survey requests, including, among others, Dr Cate Henderson, Dr Mike Clark & Dr Jackie Damant, (LSE); Professor Chris Fox & Professor Fiona Poland (UEA); Professor James Barlow (Imperial College); Professor Malcolm Fisk (DMU); Professor Jill Manthorpe (KCL); Stephen Wey (York St. John); Professor Mo Ray (Lincoln), and Dr Jenni Lynch (Hertfordshire). Any mistakes or omissions, of course, are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Citation

Woolham, J., Freddolino, P., Gibson, G. and Daniels, S. (2021), "Telecare at a crossroads? Finding researchable questions", Journal of Enabling Technologies, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-11-2020-0049

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles